|
|
Wednesday, June 10th, 2009
|
|
|
I was never a Bush fan and I'm not an Obamabot either. I gave Obama a shot, the man's a failure. He's a sad, sorry sack of shit. Do I sound bitter? Well perhaps I am because it's the same old shit. Makes promises and breaks them except the man tried to act like he was Heinz 57 and then we crack open the bottle and it's ketchup. Granted I wasn't expecting much out of the man to begin with. I was willing to give him a chance but I'm not surprised at the outcome.
Frankly Obama makes Bush good in his fiscal spending and that's not a compliment. Whenever you hear a complaint they say they inherited it. I'm sorry but after all the money you've thrown at the problem the excuse is no good. If the money was towards setting up small businesses all across the country coupled with industry making things in the U.S. this would be a real start in helping our economy thrive again. Couple that with advertising this all over the airwaves along with the new things made in the U.S. as well as the brands and you have a finish or one heck of a start.
The issue there is that makes sense towards spurring the economy and really reviving it. The goal of all this was to loot and pillage the economy, further consolidating the wealth and crippling the middle class. Couple that with the extra spending to the point of critical mass and the economy is crushed. After this immediately happens the only people with wealth in the Middle Class will be those that wisely invested in gold, silver, copper and land. Perhaps there might be something substantive with food stockpiled of quality Organic stuff instead of Victory gin and the like as well. I suppose firearms might also still have some worth.
Anyway the regular people's new wealth after this will be shit as well as the wage. Our Constitution will mean nothing since it will be a North American Union one. After all, the EU has one. Anyone starting to get the point now? The EU's is 11,000 pages. Now this is to make the Constitution seem LESS like a Constitution and more like a contract between two willing parties. This sounds better then you unwillingly gave up your countries sovereignty to join something not necessary to begin with. I mean we have all sorts of natural resources here, why the fuck do we truly need to trade?! Can someone answer me that with a straight face? We can grow Hemp, trees, cotton. We have Iron, Coal and Oil. This is nothing but a farce to think of it being legit. This is a manufactured crisis.
I advise protest and throwing the bums out of office. Basically I believe in following any and all peaceable means to deal with this before we must do worse and eject them with a minimum of force. But before let us do all we may peaceably.
I will say however if it is seen to be considered to have the internet compromised(I refer to the Internet being down) if we can not peaceably convince them to bring it back, including a threat of recall and impeachment and the like, then the minimum force necessary must be applied to bring it back online. The airwaves have been brought back to the public with truly everyone's voice to be heard, the power to allow this. We will not have this taken from us again. Such an act is intolerable and inexcusable regardless of whatever is spoken to this.
I leave this journal entry with something for you people to truly ponder. We have two choices: we can live in a society of extraordinary security where everything you do is judged and tracked. If you resist or challenge you will either be re-educated, imprisoned or killed. The other choice is we have a chance to live in a society where borders almost don't exist anymore. I refer to having a truly open exchange of information between us all, unmolested by our governments where we see each other as human beings.
Bottom line, there is no middle ground as the former is being heavily forced on us. I also believe there is an extraordinary and beautiful experiment to be seen in the latter, something unprecedented. This would truly be a direction we have never taken before.
|
|
Thursday, March 26th, 2009
|
|
|
Can someone remind what is up with Liberals and this obsession with Google and G-mail?! Have these people ever looked into Google and their CIA or FBI connections? I think it's CIA. Maybe it's even NSA. I'm pretty sure it's CIA. My question is why should they be trusted, especially with this nonsense about all your e-mail convo's kept in Google's storage even after they're deleted.
Even their motto is subjective. I mean "Do No Evil" is a lot different then "Do No Harm". Like I said, it's subjective where "Do No Harm" implicitly says you won't committ ANY act that would harm someone. "Do No Evil" implies you would committ an act that causes bodily harm if you perceived it to be good or neutral. It's too gray from a legal sense and is nonsensical from a Spiritual one as well. I mean to believe that people are fully good or evil is so black and white and absurd. It's also so contextual and perceptual. Perceptual as it's obvious what one perceives as evil another may perceive as neutral or even good. That is not to say there are things that are pretty much cultural absolutes which most if not all societies worldwide would consider as forbidden actions.
More then anything "Do No Evil" is more of a feel good motto which sounds good but is empty. We're talking about something without teeth here.
Oh and let us do our duty to Google and paste them to the sticking post, the bulletin board, to explore the belly if need be and to furthermore demand a declarative about their intentions. A backing of this as well to not wreak of foeter pushed to the side as it were. The stench, the stench I hope not to wretch from this maw. Let this be reconciled with the door to the bathroom open and all the crap to see as soon as possible.
|
|
|
I've expressed my stance to Nikki and others but let me sort out my frustration. Green, as it's portrayed primarily in the media, seems to be about Conservation and cutting back possibly. Here are a few of my obvious issues with this. While a good deal of the populace leads itself towards cowtowing towards taking guilt that only goes so far. You eventually will piss off even those people if you severely limit their electricity consumption, travel intake(taxing mileage), etc. I would argue the agenda of the Green people you see on TV is to cripple the American middle class economically as much as possible. The end game of this is to make people unable to take care of themselves, as dependent as possible on the Government who will poison them, make them weak and keep them meek. Whether of not all of them know they are doing this matters not.
Part of what needs to be done is to spread the counter message of self-sustainability which more people, be they Democratic, Conservative, Libertarian, etc. would glom onto. This enables one to be off the grid, not paying a for profit company that threatens their economic freedom moderately or less at the moment and severely through the Green Movement by way of Smart Grids in the future. In the latter this is just a part of it. Being off the grid, owning an Electric car that has good charge, growing your own crops, all of this frees up money in your pocket and allows you to be a viable competitor to the rich. This may not challenge them on their terms: for example, money. But having your own Corporation people buy from, starting your own WiFi radio show with your OWNED connection(I mean what is truly necessary to generate your own bandwidth? I bet you can make it now and have it be affordable, especially with Solar Panels and Biomass power production to do it).
Just some things here to make you think.
|
|
Thursday, February 26th, 2009
|
|
|
Let's look at how, since Obama has been elected, he's gone back on his word.
1.Don't ask, don't tell. Seriously what fucking rubbish. Obama's people say we're going to go back and do studies on it. Yeah cute after one of your own people said "yes" about getting rid of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and you back down like the spineless piece of shit you are.
2.State Secrets. So apparently some of these "terrorists"(I put quotations here because I consider the accusation they all are suspect) aren't being brought to trial because of the state secrets idea coming out. Forgive me if I'm a bit suspicious if this being anything BUT a load of horseshit.
3.Internet postings of bills like 24-48 hours before they're passed if not longer. Yeah they sure wanted to get that Stimulus load of nonsense passed asap.
Don't even give me the bullshit argument it's only been a month. Look up "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and look up the response. They clearly backpedaled. It's not even about it only being a month here, it's about what progress was made in saying that they were going to do something was wiped away.
I mean honestly what fucking nonsense. Even past you arguing on other things on Obama I still would be remiss if I didn't debate things going by the wayside that shouldn't. I happen to think Obama was supposedly presented as an alternate to Bush who gave a shit about Civil Rights. I wasn't holding my breath mind you but I would liked to be proven wrong but what do we see? Let me count the ways.
1.NONE of Bush's signing statements have been reversed. So you have the "Enemy Combatant" charge and anyone can go in jail if the accusation is thrown at them for an undetermined time.
2.No push for the Patriot Act being repealed.
Oh and let's see one of the big criticism's of Bush:
1.He's lazy and never did anything for the most part, instead spending large portions of time on vacation. What makes Obama different here then Bush? I mean it seems the only difference is Obama is more acting like a big celebrity on tour instead of cracking down and doing his job!
Seriously Obamamaniacs get your head out of your ASS!
segasnk
p.s. I haven't scratched much of the surface. I plan to have another post berating all the pork and one of the 1984esque moments of the Stimulus Bill.
|
|
Tuesday, February 10th, 2009
|
|
|
Now before I'm discounting race as an issue I'm not. I'm referring to the idea of anything involving Black and White and something discouraging happening to some Black people automatically being chalked up to race. So here I lead into why I ask if "Green" is the new race card.
First off a little history about what being "Green" has implied in the media as of late. Green has implied being energy efficient, if not saving energy as well, the conservation aspect of it. Now it seems the SMART Grid, which sounds great but here it is in English. This is after reading it at Wikipedia mind you. Basically this is adding sensors to your power in real time so when peak goes on they can gouge you in milliseconds instead of seconds or minutes after it hits. Also this is a way of automating your power station more if not further decentralizing it arguably. This "Demand Response" mentioned also will turn on your "low priority" devices only when it's cheapest or so it says. I would not be surprised if this gets to how bandwidth is for Broadband providers where one of two things happens: 1.Your power consumption is drastically cut for the rest of the month and only low power devices are allowed to be on. 2.You get a message by phone or whatever you've gone over your limit and your power is cut off or you're double or triple billed.
One is more likely to happen I believe as it can be softened in some way. Well perhaps two might slowly happen afterward. I could really see it just you getting gouged in terms of extra minutes like cell phone companies do with their plans.
Part of this is supposedly to save companies from spending money on extra plant or plants. It says something like 10% more power 1% of the time. I'd argue that isn't that a wise thing just in case? I seriously think throwing emergency situations to the wind just because of start up costs is absurd.
Lynn put out the idea of the Smart Grid's cutting your power if you go over your allotted ration. I don't know if it would be like this but more like the bandwidth idea. Regardless of which happens I don't like either. We're talking people's livelihood here.
But my issue is the idea of me, Lynn or anyone saying we have a problem with this and someone kneejerking with the yell of "Polluter!, polluter!", not giving any of us a chance to speak a word. This is reminiscent of two people, Black and White, having problems with each other and someone pointing at them from outside or perhaps the Black person yelling "Racist, racist!". I really doubt the Black person will yell that but someone else might as a kneejerk. This is why I wonder if Green is the new Race card. Perhaps that's not even a fair assessment. Maybe I should question if this is the new Anti-Semite/Israel card. You know, where you have issues with Israel and you're automatically labeled an Anti-Semite before you even get your reasons out.
Oh and I didn't even mention the double tarriff meter mentioned for overseas due to industries power stresses in peak times. Jeez I should argue THAT seems like whoever believes that nonsense would think "Net Neutrality" is dumb. I mean it basically argues businesses take priority over people in peak time when I think it should be both are equal. No offense but some of these are the same businesses that leave all their lights on. I'm talking about the skyscrapers that do it.
Anyway here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_power_grid
"Demand response support" headline mentions the whole 10% thing though it says usage of power and it's 1% of the time. The "low priority" device thing is mentioned at the very beginning of the article I believe. It is in reference to "Demand response support".
The "Price Signaling to consumers" headline talks about the double tarriff meters and tweaking up the costs to consumers as soon as it hits peak time hence my milliseconds comment.
Frankly this pisses me off as I like the Organic aspect to Green as well as being self-sustainable. The latter I refer to is in reference to being economically free of the power companies. Unfortunately a narrow section of the Green movement is being used and in a highly negative, restrictive way(Conservation). I don't think this should be the main focus of the Green Movement at all and any of us who consider ourselves Green should let it be known that eating healthy, eating Organic and becoming self-sustainable is the best thing to come from being Green. This huge self-empowerment one can receive from it.
|
|
Wednesday, January 28th, 2009
|
|
|
Just let my mind relax and converge on the proper syntax,
the most proper to compose this line, this rhyme.
Seems to be most of us have migrated.
We haven't gotten tired of the Conflagration or perhaps we have.
Instead of bragging about Sonic Assault, our job is to vault
walls the size of old Berlin time and again.
It seems 1984 is trying to close in on us but together we
can better the weather.
If not the end result seems unfathomable, scarcely imagineable.
I'd rather fight till the breath ends in a ragged gasp.
No perhaps, no boost, no gloat.
Further towards the dark and thrust we must even if we seem to be tilling at Windmills.
The impossible, most improbable is the one that may deflate the most, being boostful
and a high braggart.
What seemed one a feat, a wall that no man could leap, is now within' bounds.
When I looked around, I saw it was him and she and me.
We had all pushed each other away from the grain, the music, the life, the wife, the partner.
|
|
Thursday, November 20th, 2008
|
|
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008
|
|
|
I typed in e-Bomb in a search and got Electromagnetic Bomb in a search. It's suppose to take out electronics and such. The idea I will venture forth for you to consider is far more insidious and subtle. To put it bluntly I'm referring to a multitude of little Trojan Horses adding up to an infestation. Imagine if you will enough Termites located at the base of the foundation, at the right positions, that you just give them a simple command and take the house down in seconds if not milliseconds or nanoseconds. This sounds terrifying doesn't it? This isn't a terrorist action as overt as a bombing, an assassination or so on. I'm referring to enough government computers linked together that given the right command they become unusuable, a nationwide blackout in seconds.
This happens because of the greed of American Corporations. To be more specific how they've been quite willing to bed with the Chinese government. I'll grant you motherboards are made in Taiwan and perhaps still CPU's are but where is the storage made, or at least the hard drive storage made? Yup, China. How can we not trust them to make this perfect strike if we ever back away from the scum that represent the Chinese government?
Just something to think about and fear. China doesn't need to attack us head on. They have the perfect dagger to keep above our heads.
|
|
Thursday, September 25th, 2008
|
|
|
You know you hear Lehman Bros. and all this crap. It's ridiculous. FrannieMay and FreddicMac should NEVER have been bailed out. They should've been allowed to default.
No offense but as a bank it's your feduciary responsibility to make conservative and reasonable calculated risks. The subprime nonsense was neither, it was money shifting. These banks should've defaulted and then the FDIC paying out the $100,000 guaranteed in those accounts people put money in. Anything more nothing. You lost, tough shit. This is what you get for taking risks, especially one's that are just scams.
As for the rest of the banks that have participated, the same. It's on you too. If this was a regular person practicing such reckless behavior we wouldn't look the other way and even recompensate them. The insanity of this is just so blatantly obvious the word absurd seems quite appropo.
|
|
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008
|
|
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008
|
|
|
Get it through your head people. They won't disclose their government connections and I have my own suspicions. Granted they don't have to but when I get to having my own web site or anything like that I will BAN Google ad's from my site as well as YouTube links. Any other video link's I wouldn't have an issue with.
Google is a company you can't trust and I believe they're Arsenal Gear. If you've played Metal Gear Solid 2 you'll get the reference. If not, I don't feel like explaining right now. Anyway, don't be so fucking naive people. G-mail stores ALL the messages you receive even after deletion and I think your sent messages as well but I'm not sure there. Bottom line, do NOT trust them. As far as I'm concerned they're more dangerous then a lot of other services because of the sheer size of their infrastructure and the power they wield because of this. Then hear they have government involvement they won't disclose and it doesn't sit well with me. In fact if I'm not mistaken some people have had issues with Google involvement or ad's on sites.
Just be a bit more doubting for crying out loud!
|
|
Saturday, September 13th, 2008
|
|
|
While Maher does make some valid points he does come off snobbish at times. While Maher doesn't care that whole attitude coming from him and Hollywood is idiotic for two reasons. One, Bill, even if you have a valid point that attitude is what kills it. Bill when you represent for Obama, saying you donate money and such to him and act snobbish it creates difficulties for him because of that. If they associate Obama with you in their mind they won't elect him. I mean let's lay out who's been elected that literally treated people like they were either morons or completely ignorant, especially morons, NO ONE. That's why both candidates have the good sense to playcate the American people in not insulting their intelligence and possibly knowledge. Are most Americans ignorant of candidates decisions in politics as well as knowledge they need? Woefully so but you don't necessarily say it.
The second reason I was going to get to was, and I dbout this applies to you Bill, most Hollywood celebrities are possibly as misinformed as the general public or worse since there might be someone they very much trust spilling misinformation in their ear. What makes this worse is what they say is covered by the media so it can do a lot of damage. Especially if they even look like they're being snobbish and if they're for you Obama you're in shit for that. If they're properly educated about the issue that's not such a bad thing but no fucking whiff of snobbishness need come through.
Really Maher, don't insult people's intelligence specifically because I think most people are just ignorant and either want to bury their head in the sand or just try to shut their brain off. The key is for you to educate them properly without a hint of being condescending and making it interesting. I'm not saying make it fun just make it noticeable and they'll get out of their brain coma and start to come around and start talking about politics and paying attention like they need to.
I also think Jannine did a great disservice to her side by saying Republicans in general are evil or bad people. Well words to that effect. Let's not paint this black and white picture. I'm sure you don't appreciate Michael Savage doing it to you, saying Liberalism is a Mental Disease.
|
|
Monday, September 8th, 2008
|
|
|
I was talking with someone online and they were talking to me about how Livejournal's hey day has passed in terms of popularity. While I can see where they're coming from I'd take quality over quantity anyday. While MySpace resembles visual diarrhea in the most obnoxious way, with songs playing you might not be able to turn off combined with a virtual scrapbook with pictures all around plus entries it doesn't work. I'm going to say it's the layout big time, it's so in your face hence my Visual Diarrhea comment. I can make worse comments but I'll refrain. Facebook I might give a look.
Livejournal is a quiet look that is not overwhelming, at least from most people's entries I see. Perhaps the garish look of MySpace has allowed it to accumulate so many people and so much popularity. But I prefer the nice, quiet yet information setup in Livejournal and if you're reading this I suspect you might feel somewhat similar.
|
|
Wednesday, August 27th, 2008
|
|
Monday, August 25th, 2008
|
|
|
I can see Corn Starch in some foods as a thickener but I'm trying to wrap my head around why it was in the box of CHEERIOS I was eating! Unless Cheerios is just cooked up ground oats with Corn Starch as the cohesive to make the o's. Even then I don't remember seeing it in the list. If I missed it forgive me but I almost wonder if it was inserted because people are being PAID to put modified Corn Starch in.
I cut out Swedish Fish because it's in there now. Pretty much anything with a dusty coating has it there now. No just Corn Starch.
I remember looking at a Whole Food's listed Organic product and it had the label saying "Organic Modified Corn Starch". When you hear or read modified in food don't you possibly think it's been tampered with? I mean it's like "WTF?!".
|
|
Sunday, August 24th, 2008
|
|
|
Is it any coincidence that some Green technologies encompass self-sustainability or moreso then Fossil Fuel's? Consider Coal, Oil and others for example. Yet some Green techs. seem to naturally point in the way of self-sustainability. I mean I'll grant you that it's less possible to have those heavy power generating Windmills in an Urban setting but you can have a smaller one and that's a start.
The one technology that seems ideal for self-sustainability is Solar, that Konnarka Solar film. Imagine if you will also areas that didn't seem cost feasible to get them set up with lines you sell that Solar film to. Power with no infrastructure. Even imagine factories that have this done. The beautiful thing about this is how non-invasive it is. Compare this to the Industrial Revolution. This is the Factory Range Revolution. It's going to Africa, Asia, etc. You don't have to worry about Environmental regulations because you're not violating any.
The big concern here is transport. I think you would probably think the most logical solution dealing with this would be something like a Maglev rail car. Bear with me when I say Algae might be a start. I'll have to look more at this. Push comes to shove I like the idea of Nuclear Fusion becoming possible in terms of yielding a significant quantity of power then using a 123systems battery. The reactor would be self-contained and welded SHUT with appropriate shielding. The reactor would always be on, with the need for you to bring in new batteries once the 123's were charged with new 123's. Also if you're a business in the city and felt like this was very undesirable you could plug it into the grid, siphoning off and selling the power to the local power company.
Just some thoughts here.
|
|
Friday, August 22nd, 2008
|
|
|
Born in the year of our Lord 1947, a Messiah was born. Oh some will tell you that she was born to an ordinary woman but the truth is she was born from no human. Hillary was instead borne through the vagina of the Virgin Mary, the second Virgin birth to ever happen in the World. She has come here to save us from False Prophets and sinners like Barrack Obama. She will save us all, if she could only be elected to President Of the United States. If she is elected candy and chocolates and gum drops will fall from Heaven. Our debt will be solved. The War On Terror will be won. In short, EVERYTHING will be fixed, even Cancer. So vote for Hillary, vote for our SECOND Savior!
Seriously get the fuck over it Hillary fans. The only Politician running who was close to someone who gave a shit about us, being more a Public Servant over a Politician, was Ron Paul. This man actually gave a damn about our Civil Rights and that speaks a lot more of love for this country then the current people in the running. Oh yeah and he was opposed to a Private Institution printing our money and charging for it, i.e. the Federal Reserve. He voted against the Patriot Act too. This man knows his shit. Those stances and his action on the Patriot Act speak eons about his character.
As for Obama he's not the Messiah either. I think Obama is the one who you can ask someone about his stance on issues and most people's minds draw a blank. That's NOT a good thing. Even mine does technically though I know his big thing is Healthcare for kids.
|
|
Tuesday, August 19th, 2008
|
|
|
First off this rant is NOT for kids. Explicit LANGUAGE here!
Sorry just wanted to hopefully avoid kids seeing this. Anyway this rant is to sort out the stupid fucking CUNTS(channels Diana Cage here) who think that Digital Downloading taking over physical media is an inevitability. I launch into two sides, why it's bullshit to begin with. Two, even if it wasn't bullshit, why it wouldn't even be remotely tolerable.
Let's address the bullshit side first ok? iTunes downloads have taken drastically and tons of people are putting MP3's on their iPod's. Do we see cd's being yanked out of stores? No they seem to be as prevalent as they were before. I don't seem to have any issue finding cd's around in any store.
Now secondly, even if it looked like digital distribution seemed to be the future let's see here the issues. One, your choice of movies and now music is severely limited. After all, online your location can be tracked by IP and subsequently your access or download from a site can be blocked. One thing that's interesting to note is any music cd you buy, be it professionally pressed, see non CD-R, you'd have no problem playing on any working cd player. With this your choice of music and movies are locked down to what is considered suitable or paid for to see a region whatever version on Apples movie downloads or whatever. Oh and on DVD's I'm sure you'll argue the region coding bit but there are region free players that defeat this because the truth is people want that option. Now on a download bit this is much worse, invasive and problematic.
On an extra bit what may happen and I acknowledge what my friend says is worrisome based on being a closed, more controlled system is direct downloading from gaming consoles. I think one of the issues is the death of anthologies. Given the success of "Virtual Console Service"(VCS) on Wii, XBox Live Arcade(XBLA) and Playstation Network(PSN) on plying single old games like "Gauntlet" and others on these services it is expected that anthologies will die in the process, at least on these shores. Or rather more console based one's. To be fair at least "Gauntlet" and "Mortal Kombat 2" were the only previous anthologies and without face lifts but I suspect they were successful enough for this idea to be furthered. "Mortal Kombat 2" being a Midway game launching after "Gauntlet" leads me to this.
Now taking a point from above about regional restrictions this is already being seen with XBox Live and downloading demos. I'm not just referring to not having a console from said region but checking one's ip address as well. Now if someone has bought a console from said region they are showing deliberate intent and interest in buying product from THAT region, perhaps specific product. Some try to argue rights. My concern here is on multiple fronts. One, some of these publishers DRAG their feet on either picking up the rights, the translation, or both. "Senko no Rondo Rev. X" and Ubi Soft come to mind here. No one seemed to know about "Kengo" for GOD knows how long as well. There are other games that are between a rock and a hard place like "Idolmaster". Now getting these games and importing them to play would be no problem. With direct download this type of product is locked away to you unless you live in said region. For now it's open with physical media. Oh and as to the above demo's, add-on's might be being locked down too but I can't confirm yet.
Just something to think about here people.
|
|
|
Let's talk, shall we? About bullshit, about Obama being the Messiah and John McCain being a big War Hero. First Obama, he's not change, he's full of shit. He believes purchased cell phones should be tracked, your name, address, etc. This is after someone sent him that info they aren't. Excuse me if I decide to buy one but it's not the NSA's fucking business what I'm talking about with a friend, especially if they're a g/f or b/f and if I'm into BDSM, Sub or Dom, or want a strap on rode into me, or maybe I have a Diaper fetish, the whole baby bit. I'm citing this short list of examples to outline the absurdity of the "If you're doing nothing wrong you have nothing to hide." statement and mentality.
I'm sorry but everyone is a bit of a pervert. Even if you're the most normal sexual person, i.e. male or female Heterosexual, you will most likely get bored in your sex life and start looking for some kink. Maybe you'll try out a Cock ring, see if she goes for Anal, take a walk on the other side if you're a woman especially. Oh and there's another mundane example out there: Trying on women's clothing to spice it up. All of this type of behavior is something that is perfectly acceptable by law but not by other's standards and this is the problem. There's a man in the U.S. who was fired from his job for crossdressing in his OFF time. This is part of why I oppose all this 1984esque crap that Obama and others support, including who I thought was an upstanding Senator, John Conyers.
I've heard about McCain he will basically say or do anything to become President. Frankly I'm wondering what he's going to do to the Gay's when in office. He already certainly doesn't seem to support the Veterans when he opposed the latest GI Bill, which seemed to be supported very much by both Republicans and Democrats. If I'm wrong on the former someone please correct me. Actually I don't think I'll push hard on critisizing the label but are we not in some way glorifying war when we call anyone a hero from it? It's an ugly thing for all concerned, many die on both sides and it's truly not fortunate for those in the midst of the battle. I've heard some think McCain may bring back the draft. If this happens for any country but China I don't think people will tolerate it. It will just be the breaking point.
Oh and lest I forget, Obama the Messiah. Obama is slick, very charismatic, good delivery to most people so they're interested. It's funny though, there are no bills he can champion he authored. How about a bill he wrote to help get rid of Lobbyists but couldn't get passed through Congress? When I think of what he might do as President very little comes to mind as well except maybe for Healthcare.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Someone who helped me back in Japan on Monday January 17 or 18th, 2005 at the Hostel back in Nakano. I was the Gaijin having a bit of a problem back then but you helped me. On Monday or Tuesday of this week I felt you might be having some issues so feel free to contact me. I'd e-mail you to ask but I don't know if I have it. Also I can't seem to find the Hostel anymore.
Anyway I'm hoping you see this.
|
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
segasnk's journal
hopeful.
aggravated.
thoughtful.
scared.
